Joelle Wallach

Revisitation of Myth

Year: 1998

Duration (in minutes): 17'39;

Difficulty: Medium (college/community)

Category: small chamber ensembles - 2 to 4 players, solo voice(s) with chamber ensemble

Instruments: any female voice, any male voice, any voice, piano, viola

Publisher: Classical Vocal Reprints

Publisher website:

Outside URL:

Score PDF: A-Revisitatin-of-Myth-score-title-texts.pdf

Text PDF: revisitationtexts.pdf

Purchase score URL:

Description: 4 song cycle about new interpretations of familiar myths A Revisitation of Myth is a four-movement chamber piece for viola, piano and medium voice, with texts by Muriel Rukeyser, Luann Keener, Delmore Schwartz, and Denise Levertov.. Each of the four lyrical and moving songs re-examines a myth (or myths as in the fourth one) to discover new, different or more complex meanings. The first song, Icarus Swims, is an invitation to regard Icarus’ fall from sky to ocean in a new way. The traditional interpretation views Icarus’ immersion as punishment by the sun and the gods who melt his wax wings for his hubris in attempting to fly. Instead, this song suggests Icarus’ plunge might be seen as a baptism, an entry into a new domain, born of his adventurousness and daring. Lot’s Biblical daughter, Ms Lot, sings the eponymous second movement. She doesn’t think her father is such a great guy, whatever God thinks of him. She thinks her father betrayed her as well as her mother and her sisters; and she’s worried about what man would possibly want her now. She’s frantic and whine-y and self-centered. She probably gets it from the father she describes so resentfully. Angry in the manner of rebellious teenagers, she’s panicked, too, adjusting to a new life suddenly devoid of all that’s comforting and familiar – mother, home, the expected future. Throughout the song, a relentless, repetitive, murmuring figure passes back and forth among the musicians. While the principal melodies soar and roar, and the song speeds up and slows down, the muttering figure binds everyone together and encapsulates the protagonist’s hysteria. The third song, Hymn to Eros, is simply a plea, a sinuous, sensuous, strenuous wish. The final song, Abraham and Orpheus, exhorts these two mythic heroes, pleads for their wisdom, and compares their perplexingly similar lessons with their disturbingly opposite outcomes. Abraham complied with an order to sacrifice his beloved child as a token of his faithfulness to a faceless divinity, while Orpheus could not prevent himself from turning to look at his beloved’s face even in the shadow of death and the gods’ decree. He lost her in his all too understandable disobedience. For each, the call to duty was to be heeded more than the call of love. Abraham, who obeyed, was allowed keep the son he would have willingly, obediently sacrificed. Not so Orpheus who sang and looked back at love, convinced that the power of his love, the resonance of his song, and the mercy of the gods would prevail even over death.. The calling motive with which the viola and piano introduce the song is repeated and modified as the song continues. It evokes a variety of other voices: the calling of Abraham the father and Isaac the son, the tragic calls of Orpheus and Euridice, the singer’s own exhortation for reprieve from the myths’ harsh lesson; and it recalls as well the traditional call of a ram’s horn, a heritage of these same spiritual struggles. The myriad, shifting suggestions implied in the musical “calling” figure reflect, too, the more global unfolding and elaboration of myth and meaning themselves. “Music doesn’t get any better than this…” Mark Greenfest for New Music Connoisseu

array(8) { ["post_type"]=> array(3) { [0]=> string(7) "catalog" [1]=> string(5) " disc" [2]=> string(5) "video" } ["author_name"]=> NULL ["s"]=> NULL ["orderby"]=> string(5) "title" ["order"]=> string(3) "ASC" ["posts_per_page"]=> int(-1) ["tax_query"]=> array(1) { ["relation"]=> string(3) "AND" } ["meta_query"]=> array(1) { ["relation"]=> string(3) "AND" } }